SPACEBAR to move forward through slides.
SHIFT & SPACEBAR to move backwards through slides.
LEFT ARROW & RIGHT ARROW to move through sections.
ESC to see overview and ESC again to exit.
F to enter presentation mode and ESC to exit.
Long-term disabling conditions that cannot be healed.
Disabling conditions that pass as the body heals.
Disabling conditions created by environments.
There are three different ways to define the term ‘disability’.
Defines disability as having a deficit. The medical model wants to ‘treat’ and ‘cure’ differences.
People are disabled by barriers in society.
An example could be a wheelchair user who cannot access a train station as the only access is via stairs.
Using the medical model of disability, the user is disabled by the condition that requires them to use a wheelchair, their impairment.
Using the social model of disability, the user is disabled by the stairs and the station design, not their wheelchair or impairment.
The social model is not about changing people with impairment to accommodate society.
It’s about challenging the physical, attitudinal and social environment to accommodate people living with impairment.
The legal definition of ‘disability’ may differ in each country.
Persons are considered to have a disability if they have a limitation, restriction or impairment, which has lasted, or is likely to last, for at least six months and restricts everyday activities.
ADHD, Autism and other neurodivergence can be considered disabilities if they meet the criteria in the Disability Discrimination Act.
Mental illnesses can also be considered disabilities if they meet the criteria in the Disability Discrimination Act.
Ensuring that your products, services, and facilities meet the needs of people of all abilities.
Any questions or comments?
Some people prefer to be referred to as ‘differently-abled’. Others prefer the term ‘disabled’.
Emily is a passionate disability rights activist, writer, speaker, and digital communications consultant who educates people about her life with a physical disability.
Emily has a great book on this topic: ‘Demystifying Disability - What to Know, What to Say, and How to Be an Ally’ (15:40 - 17:52).
Always ask people for their preferences.
Any questions or comments?
The discrimination of and social prejudice against people with disabilities based on the belief that these people are inferior.
Ableism can include the following in regard to people with disabilities:
Any questions or comments?
There are two key resources for understanding and meeting digital accessibility obligations in Australia:
1. All public-facing digital products in Australia are required to comply with the ‘Disability Discrimination Act 1992’.
It is unlawful for a person who, whether for payment or not, provides goods or services, or makes facilities available, to discriminate against another person on the ground of the other person’s disability.
2. The Australian Human Rights Commission recently released the Guidelines on Equal Access to Digital Goods and Services.
These guidelines offer practical advice on making websites, apps, and other digital services accessible to people with disability.
Organisations should conform with WCAG 2.2 at a minimum Level AA and consider appropriate Level AAA success criteria such as video transcripts, audio contrast, clear links and section headings.
A number of legal cases have highlighted what can happen when organisations fail to meet these responsibilities.
Legal action can be costly, but the damage to an organisation’s reputation could be even worse.
Became a global symbol of inaccessible websites, reputational damage far outweighed small legal costs.
National headlines highlighted failure to provide accessible coaches.
Mainstream media coverage painted Coles as excluding customers with disabilities.
Ongoing press scrutiny over poor treatment of disabled travellers.
Features designed for people with disabilities often improve the user experience for many other groups.
If you provide captions, they help people who are deaf or hard of hearing.
But captions also help people in noisy environments, and people with temporary hearing loss.
If you use good colour contrast, this will help people with low vision or Colour vision deficiency.
But good contrast also helps people looking at screens in bright light and people with temporary vision issues.
If you make all your digital products keyboard accessible, it will help people with no vision and people with limited movement.
But keyboard accessibility also helps people with temporary issues, people whose hands are busy, and power users.
Do you know the percentage of people who have some form of disability in Australia?
These estimates are known to be low, as people:
So the real number is likely higher — about 1 in 5 Australians.
Accessibility does not guarantee revenue growth or new customers.
However, it can reduce friction across the system.
This could be fewer frustrated customers or fewer abandoned flows.
It could also mean less rework and lower servicing costs.
Any questions or comments?
We’re going to look at a range of different people and how they interact with the digital world.
A person is considered legally blind if they can’t see at six metres what someone with regular vision can see at 60 metres, or if their field of vision is less than 20 degrees in diameter.
Colour vision deficiency (CVD) or Colour blindness, is the decreased ability to see colour or differences in colour.
Any of these people could be your customers — now or in the future.
Any questions or comments?
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) develops international standards for the World Wide Web.
One of these standards is the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines - often shortened to ‘WCAG’.
WCAG explains how to make websites and digital content more accessible to people with disabilities.
The current standard is WCAG 2.2, launched on 5 October 2023.
These ensure that content is accessible from multiple perspectives.
These define 12 goals that help achieve each principle.
The 87 Success Criteria across all the guidelines help assess whether digital content is accessible.
Each Success Criterion has a Compliance level of ‘A’, ‘AA’, or ‘AAA’.
This is the minimum level of accessibility and includes basic requirements to make content usable for some people with disabilities.
This is the recommended standard for most websites, balancing accessibility with practical implementation.
This is the highest level and includes advanced accessibility features, but it’s not always required for all content.
In order to be ‘AA’ compliant, sites must meet all ‘A’ and ‘AA’ Success Criteria - 56 criteria in total.
The following document is normative. That means it contains the official requirements you must meet to be WCAG conformant.
The official list of success criteria that explain what websites and digital content need to do to be accessible to people with disabilities.
The following documents are informative. They help you understand and apply the guidelines, but they’re not required for conformance.
Explains each success criterion in plain language, helping you understand why it matters and how to apply it.
An interactive checklist that helps you find the specific WCAG success criteria, techniques, and tips you need based on your role or task.
A tool that lets you sort and filter WCAG success criteria and best practices by role, topic, and project phase.
A tool that helps you generate clear, detailed accessibility acceptance criteria for user stories and digital tasks.
There is a wide range of accessibility testing tools that can be used to identify and address accessibility issues.
All accessibility testing tools have limitations.
Regardless of which automated testing tool you use, they all only cover about 25-30 percent of WCAG requirements, and the remainder of the requirements need manual testing.
If an accessibility testing tool passes a website, this doesn’t necessarily mean the site is accessible.
Most accessibility testing tools cannot detect the following:
Tools can’t judge if headings, links, or alt text make sense in context.
They may detect a focus style but can’t confirm if it’s visible or meets contrast requirements.
They don’t assess whether the content order is logical for assistive tech or keyboards.
They can’t fully test interactive behaviour in menus, modals, or custom controls.
They don’t reliably detect if buttons are large enough or spaced appropriately.
They can’t assess whether users are guided to avoid or fix input errors.
They don’t judge tone, clarity, or reading level of written content.
They don’t detect timeouts, motion triggers, or options to pause animations.
They can’t confirm if captions or transcripts are present, accurate, or synchronised.
They don’t simulate real use by screen reader, voice, or switch users.
However, these tools are still very useful - as long as we are aware of their strengths and weaknesses.
Let’s quickly run through some of the testing tools available.